24th Symposium Valcamonica ‘11
Capo di Ponte, July 13-18 2011
Art and Communication in Pre-literate SocietiesHow
Art Was Speaking Out
the Superiority of Chief over all others
Léo
DUBAL
Virtual Laboratory for Archaeometry
dubal
(at) archaeometry.org
"Man
is a Difficult Beast to Draw", under
this title,
at the IFRAO Conference NEWS’96,
Deregowski,
introduced the stimulating concept of «typical
contour».
This
concept is most
useful to understand what could be seen as
prehistorical school of painting», i.e.: the
Gravettians Venuses
in the caves of Pech-Merle
and Cussac.
Those
caves are apart, as the crow flies, by about
50 km.
Those
faceless Nurturers have surprinsingly
similar typical
contour,
despite
mirror
image, and different
techniques used,
such as mud scratching
and rock engraving
i.e.
Naquane, ,
rock
# 32 or
at Foppe
di
Nadro.
In
those scenes, there is no threat or domination
signal
despite their raised arms.
Now
comes the question of
What are actually
the
attributes of a male chief ?
At
the 2nd Congress
of Rupestrian
Archaeology, 1997, with Luc Joly we suggested
“orthogonality”
might be such an attribute.
At
the open air rock art site of La Gardette sur
Cèze,
the anthropomorphic figures, all males,
have
their axis of symmetry
aligned with the shadow
of a stick on sunrise at
winter’
solstice.
A way, maybe, of expressing this
great chief feeling of
“heading
the sun off”,
and commanding it to retrace its steps toward North.
is
the man with a twisted
spear, at Listleby (Bohusland, Sweden).
On
the plane surface of this rock the complete
set
of a male hunter’s attributes is
represented:
The
trunk, arms and head are depicted facing us.
A
top-view is chosen for the two strong left
feet,
recognizable through their big toe,
the
powerful calves are profiled from the
left side,
just
like the scrotum and erected penis
the
raised right
arm
with the twisted spear,
pointing maybe toward the Big Dipper
(the Great
Bear) to keep control of his direction,
the
scrutinizing eyes, and the ears kept open,
and
finally the left
arm
raised
with strechted fingers toward the sky crowning the dominating chief.
This
engraving of a Raised
Arm Man is actually a
mythogramme,
as coined by Leroi-Gourhan
depicting the Superiority of the Chief over
all Others
At
the 1st Symposium Valcamonica’68,
Raymond Christinger presented his analysis of the
astonishing zoophilic scene at Coren del
Valento.
In fact, a somewhat similar scene
has
been found in Bohusland, at Kallsängen.
Christinger
detected the representation of a chief,
with three fingers stretched out
as
trying to call the sky to witness.
Those
pointing fingers are alike those of a proto-Neptunian
trident
crowning the chief while he has
intercourse with his mare or she-ass.
At
the Levant, with the first imperial conquests,
the mythogramme of the raised arm man
has co-existed with early forms of “literate”
writing,
and will remain nearly
unchanged for three millennia.
In
the 1st Dynasty, the
hippopotamus ivory label
of
Pharaoh
Den's
sandal
is
its first dated show piece (McGregor 1922).
Let's note that Pharaoh Den is represented bare foot !
This scene was composed some 1500 years
before
the open
air Rock art scene at
Coren
del Valento.
We see the typical contour of
the Pharaoh,
viewed from his right hand
side, except for the
trunk facing us.
His
royal attributes are an oxtail at the belt
holding his pagne,
the uraeus adorning his head-dress,
a
pear-shaped club in his raised
right hand,
ready to massacre an enemy
(here we have the
stereotyped
representation of an Asiatic,
with a
thick long tress and pointed beard).
The
Pharaoh grab with his left hand,
not the tail
of his mare like the chief at Coren del Valento,
but the mane of his captive,
while holding with the same hand some
weapons.
The
most well-known representation of the
«Canon of
the Superiority of the Chief»
is a little
posterior to the label of Den's sandal,
i.e.:
the
palette of Narmer.
In the 3rd
Dynasty, raised arm pharaoh Sekhemkhet
appeared also in Rock art in the Sinaï.
In
the 4th Dynasty,
the depicted raised arm pharaoh
(in Sahara, near Dakhla) is probably Djedefre,
the one who lent his face to the Sphinx of Giza.
In
the 18th Dynasty, after King Thoutmosis I,
the raised arm man,
this time,
is a woman :
Queen Nefertiti !
According
to Julian Jaynes,
it is toward -1250 that
appeared Narratization.
Instead of timeless
emphatic declarations,
time-consciousness
allowed
one to say a
myth.
And this,
without doubts,
represents the most serious
challenger to mythograms.
Nevertheless,
thanks to its universal
readability,
the mythogramme remained attractive.
In
the 19th
Dynasty, Ramses II
is
still represented just as Den and Narmer were .
Better
than words, the
mythogram of the superiority of the Chief
allowed the Pharaoh
to dodge more easily the hard facts
about
battles, such as the one of Qadesh.
More
than half a millennium later, ca.
-700,
during
the 26th Dynasty,
despite Egyptian conservatism,
variations in the iconography are noticeable,
while,
in the Egyptian
sphere of influence,
the mythogram
substrate changed,
from the Pharaonic
bas-relief
to silver patella (patère).
Samples
have been found all around the Mediterranean
sea.
Here,
a close-up of those patellae reminding the
taste of the Phoenician-Punic for Egyptianizing
décor.
Conclusion
:
Well
beyond pre-literate
societies, replications
of
the mythogram of the
superiority
of the Chief
remained
faithful to the
typical
contour of
a man with raised arm.